Supporting Your Piano Pathway
Reflection by Andrew Eales
The rather stark title of this Fermata blog post comes from a quote found in a book written by two of the world’s leading education experts:
“We have piled onto our children stress upon stress, pressure upon pressure, standardised test upon standardised test.
There is no evidence that this has helped our children’s learning or their futures, but we keep doing it, year after year, to millions upon millions of children the world over.
We have done this helplessly, almost involuntarily, like the victims of some sort of hypnotism, like people in a dream, like lemmings heading for the sea…
This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense, for any society or for any child; it is childhood hanging on a cliff of sorrow.”
Pasi Sahlberg & William Doyle: Let the Children Play
(2019, Oxford University Press)
Assuming we respect the research, expertise and authority of Sahlberg and Doyle, as so many leading international organisations and educators do, then their passionate plea obviously deserves our attention.
As well as being an indictment of our present schools system, it follows that those who promote regular graded exams as standardised testing of musical attainment, however well intentioned, are on very shaky ground.
Assessing our priorities
Amateur music qualifications can undoubtedly be useful as occasional milestones, but their supposed value and recommended frequency have been grossly exaggerated in recent years, skewing the learning priorities of many, and profoundly impacting players’ sense of worth, confidence, and potential.
When Sahlberg and Doyle assert that there is no evidence to support the idea that such testing ‘has helped our children’s learning or their futures’, we can be sure their claim has been rigorously researched.
And with so many of the world’s best and most acclaimed concert pianists training and coming from countries which largely avoid the British obsession with graded exams, we can hardly feign surprise!
But these truths about standardised testing and benchmarked grading are so disruptive to the falsehoods we have collectively (and commercially) bred that some will sincerely struggle to accept them.
Some may be wondering whether advocacy for a more playful approach is a thinly veiled harbinger for “dumbing down”, a dangerous shift away from the work ethic that is so crucial for success as a pianist. But in reality, the grade exams themselves are far less demanding these days, and hardly breed those rigorous values.
Others will quickly chip in that without the grade exam system, we have no way of knowing whether players are making effective progress. But this seems to be predicated on a dismal conviction that today’s players lack motivation, and that they, their teachers and parents are incapable of recognising and celebrating their musical achievements.
Piano grades and assessments undoubtedly have value, but let’s keep them firmly in their rightful place, rather than magnifying their role.
Let’s stop acting like “lemmings heading for the sea”, mindlessly following the crowd with little or no professional reflection. Let’s not leave today’s piano students “hanging on a cliff of sorrow”, but rather adopt a more personal, playful, positive educational pathway.
In my article Putting the PLAY back into Playing the Piano, I have presented a positive manifesto for a more informed, engaged, and imaginative approach to piano education that aligns with Sahlberg and Doyle’s research, and which appropriates the seven properties of play proposed by Dr. Stuart Brown.
The power of play is often invoked in education. Yes, we are still learning what this means in practice. But better to contribute to a brighter future than to remain stuck in a loop of boredom and regret.
Pianodao includes 700+ free articles and reviews.
If you value this resource, please support the site:
